Blog
| Older Entries | |||||
|
|||||
|
Mon, 02 Nov 2009 |
|||||
| Mexican Revolution: October 1915 | |||||
|
By October 1915, Venustiano Carranza's
Constitutionalist forces effectively had driven a
firm wedge between the ideologically allied forces
of Emiliano Zapata in Morelos and Francisco
"Pancho" Villa north of Mexico City. After the
crushing defeats of Villa's Division of the North
at the two main battles of Celaya in April, the
armies of Carranza and Álvaro Obregón controlled
the center of the country, paving the way for a
Constitutionalist takeover of the capital. In less
than a year after the fractious Convention of
Aguascalientes, Carranza's supporters had
superseded all their opponents and choked them off
into more and more isolated sections of Mexico.
Yet, three months still remained in what the
scholar William Weber Johnson has described as
"perhaps the bloodiest year since the Conquest" in
Mexico's history.
On October 11, 1915, a portion of Carranza's
government transferred to Mexico City from
Veracruz, where it had been in exile since its
falling out with Provisional President Eulalio
Gutierrez and his agrarian reformers and the
Villistas and Zapatistas in November 1914. This
enabled the U.S. administration of Woodrow Wilson
to extend de facto recognition of the Carranza
faction as the official government of Mexico. With
this recognition came a prohibition by Washington
on the sales of arms or provisions to any other
group waging war in the countryside. Professionally
written essays:
request help with Writing
essays by trusted essay writers. The best service
online! This decision, too, eventually would wear
down any political or military opposition to Carranza.
The Zapatistas in the south remained strangely
passive in reaction to "MisterWilson's" actions. To
the scholar John Womack Jr., this attitude is
explained as a native skepticism grounded in five
years of witnessed desertions and treacheries;
simply put, the Zapatistas doubted that Carranza
"could retain the loyalty of the genuine
revolutionary generals around him." But a more
practical reason may be offered: cut off and
isolated in the state of Morelos, consistently
rebuffed by U.S. authorities as socialists and
bandit rebels who would dare to redistribute
commercial estates into holdings for peasant
villagers, and now denied any access to U.S. arms,
Zapata and his chiefs had nowhere to go and no
means by which to break out. For the most part, the
Zapatistas continued to raid the south but were no
longer considered a serious threat to stability by
the Constitutionalists and their foreign allies.
What Zapata could not clearly see as yet was the
reconsolidation of Mexico with Carranza as First
Chief. Although the Carranza forces, in Womack's
words, "could not yet dominate the whole nation,
they could prevent any other factions from
displacing them. Henceforth they would rule."
Ultimately this would also mean that those who
fought "in the interests of the rural poor" would
never "become the Mexican state." The glorious
unifying visions of Zapata's Plan of Ayala,
steadily dimmed by Carranza's elitist regime, never
would be realized.
|
|||||
|
Posted 08:52 No comments | Post a comment |
|||||
| Ideas and Social Backgrounds in Convention of Aguascallentes | |||||
|
The many different ideas and social backgrounds
represented in the Conventionalist forces differed
greatly. Villa in his reforms thought of his troops
and their families, and also of those peasants
whose lands had been taken by the large landowners,
but he never included the poor landless peasants,
nor did he think of incorporating the laborers in
manufacturing processes or even in the
administration of the haciendas. One could say that
his reforms were based on methods of redistribution
of wealth. On the contrary, Zapata's Plan of Ayala
demanded immediate possession of all land, water,
and hills usurped by the large hacienda owners and
recognition of land ownership to the individual who
works on it, both of which ideas created an
unbridgeable gap between poor peasants and
landowners. At the core of their differences was
the composition of the troops: whereas Zapata's
army was formed mostly of poor, landless peasants,
Villa's consisted of former hacienda workers, day
laborers, and even miners and railway workers.
Their differences are significant even in the
military field. Research
paper writing for college students. Order Research
paper writing by educated research
paper writers at this site only! Villa could
plan large-scale battles and move his troops and
their families throughout the wide open spaces of
the northern states, thereby imposing his reforms
to those territories that came under his control;
Zapata remained localized and sheltered in the
central-southern states of Morelos, Guerrero,
Puebla, and a part of Veracruz, where he led a
highly effective guerrilla war ideally suited to
those mountainous regions, and even allowed a
rotation of his troops, so that the fighter became
a producer and vice versa, thereby guaranteeing the
food supply. Neither one offered a viable political
alternative to the nation's future.
Meanwhile, Carranza made great progress in the
political and military future of his forces,
consolidating his provisional government in
Veracruz and making moves to gain the support of
the lower classes, who soon would follow his
commands. An example was the Red Battalions, who,
promised better labor legislation and the creation
of national unions, fought the Villistas in El
Ebano, the Zapatistas in Jalapa and Orizaba, and
joined Obregón's troops in El Bajío. In October
1915, a radically different panorama from the one
seen in December 1914 emerged: defeated Villistas,
isolated Zapatistas, and strengthened
Constitutionalists with full legal powers under the
leadership of Carranza, who then went on a
six-month political tour of the country, returning
to Mexico City to give it back its status of
political capital. A new stage in the history of
Mexico had begun.
|
|||||
|
Posted 08:52 No comments | Post a comment |
|||||
| The Convention of Aguascallentes | |||||
|
On August 14, 1914, under the Treaties of
Teoloyucan, Mexico City fell under the control of
the Constitutionalist forces. Early on, however,
differences between the leaders arose, centered on
the provisional presidency and the future of the
leadership of the Constitutionalist troops. The
Treaties of Teoloyucan called for the organization
of a national junta, and this implied the hard work
of achieving conciliation and planning a national
convention where fundamental decisions regarding
the political future of the country would be made.
Carranza's conception materialized in the first
convention that took place on October 1, 1914; the
conference was unrepresentative, for it included
only the Revolutionary leaders, and not the
Zapatistas or representatives of other social groups.
By contrast, in the Sovereign Revolutionary
Convention of Aguascalientes, which took place from
October 10 to November 13 of the same year, all
movements, ideas, and philosophies of all national
and provincial groups and social classes were well
represented. The convention's early calls for unity
soon gave way to an irreconcilable split between
the Carrancista (whose spokesman there was Obregón)
and the more radical factions of Villa and Zapata.
Ultimately, the Carrancistas lost control of the
proceedings, and Eulalio Gutiérrez was chosen as
provisional president, an office Carranza himself
assumed he would possess. When news of the events
reached him, Carranza withdrew his forces from
Mexico City and set up a separate Constitutional
government in Veracruz. The convention then
followed an erratic course as a result of
additional schisms; it moved to Mexico City (
January 1915), Cuernavaca (February), back to
Mexico City (July), Toluca (August), and finally
back to Cuernavaca (October).
As the months passed, the convention gradually was
dominated first by Villa's forces, and eventually
by Zapata's, so that toward the end the convention
lost the original popular representation it had
possessed, a fact mirrored by the irrepressible
advance of the Constitutionalists throughout the
country. custom
essays done from scratch by professional essay
writers. Get Custom
essay service of high quality right now! The
triumph of the Revolution's bourgeois wing over the
popular armies showed the difficulties of
transferring the Revolutionary power as embodied in
the convention to effective political power; these
difficulties were symbolized by the failure of
Villa and Zapata to assume legal executive powers
after their triumphant entry into Mexico City in
December 1914. Before Villa and Zapata eventually
abandoned the capital and retreated to their
respective areas of influence, Villa expressed the
problem very clearly when, inside the executive
office in the National Palace and alternately
sharing the presidential chair with Zapata, he
exclaimed, "This chair is too big for us."
|
|||||
|
Posted 08:51 No comments | Post a comment |
|||||
| Pressure to the Huerta Regime | |||||
|
U.S. president Wilson applied further pressure to
the Huerta regime by ordering U.S. companies in
Mexico to suspend fiscal payments to the
government. He then offered financial support of
Carranza, giving him cash in lieu of future taxes.
On February 3, 1914, Wilson finally decreed the
free flow of arms into Mexico, and the states of
Sonora and the border city of Ciudad Juárez became
supply centers for the Constitutionalist Army.
Wilson found his pretext for military intervention
after the brief detention of a U.S. officer and six
sailors by a Huertista garrison during their
defense of Tampico on April 9, 1914. The U.S. Navy
lodged a strong protest and the Mexican commander
apologized, ordering the arrest of the unfortunate
officer. But the U.S. State Department claimed that
the whaleboat from which the shore party had
arrived flew a U.S. flag. Wilson demanded that the
flag be hoisted above the shoreline with the
Mexicans obliged to fire a 21gun salute to it. Well
prepared essays:
get help with essay
services by experienced essay writers.
Excellent service
online! When Huerta refused to submit to all these
demands, Wilson obtained congressional approval to
intervene in Mexico.
The landing at Veracruz took place on April 21,
1914, and involved 2,000 soldiers supported by 65
ships with almost 30,000 marines on board, and it
fully achieved the objective of provoking and
dispersing Huerta's troops that until then had been
confronting the simultaneous advance of the
Villistas and Constitutionalists toward Mexico
City. Huerta tried, unsuccessfully, to call for
national unity to repeal the foreign invasion, but
the armed struggle in the interior did not come to
a halt; on the contrary, the Constitutionalists
proclaimed themselves defenders of the national
territory in case of a declaration of war. One of
the main objectives of the U.S. invasion was the
attempt to stop the advance of the peasant movement
within Carranza's troops (the effects of which were
being felt in the United States), rather than bring
about the downfall of the Huerta regime. This
motivation became evident when the marines did not
abandon the country after Huerta left the
presidency ( July 1914), but only four months
later, on November 22, 1914, when a new stage of
the Revolution had already begun, after Obregón's
and Carranza's entry into Mexico City (August 15
and 20, respectively).
|
|||||
|
Posted 08:51 No comments | Post a comment |
|||||
| Huerta's Late Regime | |||||
|
Huerta's regime soon abandoned its quest for
legitimacy and applied dictatorial methods to
remain in power, the culmination of a chain of
events that included the military advance of the
Constitutionalist and the Zapatista Armies, the
Huerta regime's financial failure, its political
isolation in the capital, and the continuing
hostility of the U.S. government. Thus, starting in
October 1913, Huerta's government changed in a
radical way, starting with the assassinations of
Chihuahua governor Abraham González,
Representatives Edmundo Pastelín, Adolfo Gurrión,
and Serapio Rendón, and Senator Belisario
Dominguez. Research
paper writing for college students. Order Free research paper by trained
research
paper writers at this site only! Huerta's new
approach continued with the suspension of the
legislative and judicial chambers and the
introduction of forced conscription in order to
augment the federal troops. Needless to say, the
second Huerta period was characterized by rule with
an iron hand.
This sudden turn of events provoked discussion in
the U.S. Congress of an armed intervention to
protect U.S. interests and investments. The future
of Mexican oil production and the imminent
beginning of World War I were important factors in
the implementation of this plan. While the plan was
being discussed, an important event took place:
Huerta, denied most external financing by the U.S.
refusal to recognize him, sought help from Germany
and England, and especially from Sir Weetman
Pearson ( Lord Cowdray), founder of the nation's
most important oil company, the Compañía Petrolera
El Águila (which controlled more than half of
Mexico's oil production), who negotiated a loan in
England on behalf of the Mexican government, a fact
that infuriated the White House. The U.S. president
soon issued an ultimatum, declaring that the United
States would not tolerate a European outpost in
Mexico and would intervene militarily to stop it.
England offered neutrality under the condition that
the United States eliminate discriminatory tariffs
directed against foreign vessels in the Panama
Canal, which would allow the British to keep
obtaining Mexican oil for the imminent
conflagration. Ultimately, the British discovered
that the Mexican oil was of too low a quality for
their fleet.
|
|||||
|
Posted 08:50 No comments | Post a comment |





